Login

Start Free Trial Are you a business?? Click Here

Are you a business?

Terms & Conditions

User Privacy Policy

Business User Privacy Policy

Data Protection

Arbtech Reviews

4.8 Rating 559 Reviews

96 %

of reviewers recommend Arbtech

Company Reviews

About Arbtech:

Arbtech is the leading ecological consultancy for planning and development clients and professionals throughout the UK. https://arbtech.co.uk

Visit Website

Phone:

01244 661170

Location:

3 Well House Barns, Chester Road, Bretton
Chester
CH4 0DH

Write Your review

Tell us how Arbtech made you happy

Help future customers by talking about customer service, price, delivery, returns & refunds.

Minimum 10 characters

What's your name?

What's your email?

We need your email address to verify that your review is genuine

Please note that we may share your email with the company to verify your order.

Anonymous

Anonymous // 01/01/2019

Filter: Helpful None 5 Stars 4 Stars 3 Stars 2 Stars 1 Stars Helpful

“Having dealt with Arbtech for more than 4 years in an attempt to obtain a bat mitigation licence, despite them applying more than two years ago for this licence, it has still not been received. All necessary surveys were carried, at great cost, and I was not even told when the consultant dealing with this application left the company. I am totally dissatisfied with the service, or lack of it, that I have received, and hope that after todays telephone conversation the matter will be brought to a satisfactory conclusion without further cost to myself. It is also hoped that this review is put on your website to prove that it is not only positive feedback that is made public.”

Posted 1 year ago

“Planning orientated and not very practical when it comes to dealing with fast-moving refurbishment projects. The preliminary Roost assessment didn't tell us anything we didn't already know and costs were misleading. All we wanted was a clear answer on whether a bat roost was present. The project was delayed by a month when there were no bats present. A more practical surveyor was able to conduct very quick emergence surveys to give us an almost instant answer allowing our project to proceed!”

Posted 8 months ago

Hi Angus. The surveys we provided were done in accordance with best practice guidelines. They must be done this way to be accepted by your planning authority. We provided a report showing our recommendations - additional surveys were needed. The initial survey would have been needed no matter which surveyor you chose or what type of project you were working on.

Posted 8 months ago

“Excellent communication . Prompt Attendance when requested .”

Posted 9 years ago

Hi Andrew Thank you for taking the time to review us, we really appreciate the kind words and feedback. Hope to work again for you soon! Regards Rob

Posted 9 years ago

“Dreadful service. Very expensive, slow, extremely unclear and misleading T&Cs. Do not choose the so-called "Rapid" service - your report could take 3 weeks (or more) to be received. Will never use again, and make sure no one I know does either.”

Posted 10 months ago

“Worse experience ever. £500 for 10 minute bat survey. Recommended 1 survey when I started to question the evidence it suddenly changed to 2 surveys . They even had the audacity to accuss me of swearring to there staff which is now with my soilictor .”

Posted 1 year ago

As you well know, you were provided with a bat survey, a 26 page report and numerous lengthy emails helping you to understand the bat survey requirements after you were unhappy with the results. At Arbtech, we do not tolerate anyone being rude or abusive to our staff. We’ve already informed you that we won’t be working with you again and you will need to find another consultancy who will make the same recommendations.

Posted 1 year ago

“We've been working with Arbtech this season for both Arbs and Eco surveys to support our clients' applications for planning permission. From initial instruction to receipt of reports, the process is seamless, timely, and painless. The members of staff we've had the pleasure of working with have been extremely accommodating and informative throughout. In particular, Jo McCarthy and Clare Murphy who frankly, provide a service unparalleled to many other built environment consultancies – Despite the significant workloads generated for us all post COVID. STL (and of course, our clients) cannot thank you enough and will continue to recommend your services.”

Posted 2 years ago

We will pass this on to Jo and Clare!

Posted 2 years ago

“I had a disappointing experience with Arbtech. Despite initially booking a Pat survey through their website, I encountered several issues throughout the process. The service was subpar, with the surveyor lacking professionalism. Additionally, I was shocked to discover hidden costs, as I was pressured into purchasing unnecessary additional surveys at exorbitant prices. It's worth noting that Arbtech wanted me to do two extra surveys, whereas I found another reputable company that completed the job for less and without requesting additional surveys. When I attempted to address my concerns with the company, I was met with dismissiveness and threats of legal action. Overall, I cannot recommend Arbtech due to their poor communication, unprofessionalism, and unethical business practices.”

Posted 2 weeks ago

We appreciate that you're disappointed with needing extra surveys. Nobody likes extra costs, but accusing us of a subpar service, being unprofessional and being unethical simply because you don't want to pay your invoice is unfair. Our surveys were carried out to our usual high standards with our surveyor correctly identifying many potential bat roost sites. Her findings were confirmed by one of our senior consultants and we went to great lengths to explain all of this to you. There is no pressure applied from us - we simply give you what you paid us for - our professional opinion of the surveys you need to get done in order for your planning to get consent.

Posted 3 days ago

“This is the worst company we have dealt with. They charged us a Rapid Report fee and when the survey was booked and paid for, they told us Rapid fee only covers quick survey. After more than 3 weeks, we still have not received the report. What a crooked practice that is- Dave”

Posted 1 month ago

“I’ve used this company on 3 x different projects through my planning consultant, Never again as the pricing structure is extortionate the way it’s set up and extremely expensive , Just have a report for nearly a third of what I was quoted here”

Posted 5 months ago

“We were very poorly advised from the outset. if we had been given the proper advice we would have gone straight for the full survey rather than having a preliminary survey which added £700 to the total cost.”

Posted 9 months ago

Hi Jennifer. You were advised correctly. In accordance with professional survey guidelines (Collins, 2016) a Preliminary Roost Assessment is the first stage in the bat survey process. You need a Preliminary Roost Assessment to identify roost features that bats might use as well as evidence of roosting bats. This is used to assess the roost value of the building for bats which, in turn, dictates the number of additional surveys that are necessary (if any) to establish roost presence/absence and to characterise any roosts present as well as the number of surveyors required to provide full coverage of the building. As part of the planning process, the LPA will expect to see a Preliminary Roost Assessment alongside any further bat surveys that may be required to determine a planning application, and it is a necessary first step to conserve bats and their roosts which are protected by law.

Posted 9 months ago

“We cancelled our survey due to Planning issues but were never informed of the cancellation fees at the time of booking or at the time of cancellation and have now been struck with a £350 fee to pay. Ludacris!”

Posted 11 months ago

Our version of events is very different to yours as we had no record of any cancellation being made, either in writing or over the phone. As such, we attended the survey as agreed with our consultant. We could have rearranged the survey with no issues if we had received instructions to cancel.

Posted 11 months ago

“Got a booking form with different fees for a survey in a few weeks, one on next available day and one for next day service. Completed forms asked for next day service and didn’t hear back for 2 days. I called to ask why and was told they can’t do the survey for another 3 weeks !!!! If I hadn’t called myself they would not even have informed me they don’t actually have a next day service .”

Posted 1 year ago

Hi Sukhbir. We do offer a next working day service but they can become unavailable due to high volumes of instructions. If that happens we will do everything we can to accommodate you as quickly as possible and charge a reduced fee which we did for you and you agreed to.

Posted 1 year ago

“This company has sufficient professional expertise to do bat surveys but grossly exaggerated the problem and hence the consequential fees for remedying it. Arbtech charged a larger than usual survey fee and £4500 for subsequent surveys. We were able to get adequate surveys done for less than £500. To be avoided”

Posted 2 years ago

“Pestered for review...”

Posted 2 years ago

“So far so rubbish. Not clear on timeline. Not correct person named on report. Not receiving report via email unless phoning company to directly request it. £500 + initial consult with awful follow-up service. Company booked on first survey and then due to slack follow up as described above said they were unable to accommodate the subsequent surveys except within a whole year timeline. Not acceptable.”

Posted 2 years ago

Dear Julia, We would like you to remove or withdraw your completely false review. It is simply unethical to leave negative reviews in the public domain simply because events outside of your (and our) control are not wholly and completely in your favour. You/your agent (whom you authorised to appoint us in writing) were advised in writing on the 13th of July that you required further surveys and then you/your agent took almost a month to respond, by which point the season has almost finished. It should therefore come as no surprise that we could not accomodate you because other, more organised clients have appointed us to capacity in the meantime. The £500+ you quote a); is our price including VAT, and b); is not an "initial consult" at all. It was a full PRA bat survey, quoted for in writing, in some considerable detail, on which you appointed us. It was a fixed-fee and included our expenses, travelling time, site survey, mileage and your report. Finally, your report was (and is) entirely correct and accurate. Any delays for you to complete your further surveys are entirely because you/your agent took almost a month to respond to us, at a highly critical time in the year. I will be contacting you by phone and in writing to discuss this further. Sincerely, Robert Oates Managing Director

Posted 2 years ago

“Fay and the Arbtech team produced a first class document and the service was excellent. This was our first project with them but we have already engaged them for other works. Thanks Fay”

Posted 2 years ago

“We have had a Preliminary bat roost assessment carried out. The service was friendly, extremely responsive and very professional at all times.”

Posted 3 years ago

“The lady that completed the survey was at our property for about 15mins! very expensive for the service received.”

Posted 3 years ago

“We had a PRA survey and were completely underwhelmed by what appeared to be a licence to print money. Absolutely no evidence of bats found but the Arbtech surveyor says further surveys are required! The surveyor was not equipped for the job; limitations in scope were not explained in advance; factual inaccuracies were present in the report; and the actual work did not reflect the scope of work requested.”

Posted 5 years ago

“We recommend Jon Hartley and Arbtech unreservedly. Their deliverables have always been of the highest quality and they are always happy to consider "out of the box" options to address site constraints and individual client requirements more generally.”

Posted 5 years ago

«
1
2
3
4
»

Arbtech is rated 4.8 based on 559 reviews