I am not satisfied with their policy and believe that it is nothing more than an aggressive commercial practice and money luring. Last year I paid for a year subscription for VideoScribe service, but did not use it much. I almost forgot about it. But realized that they charged me for the next year subscription. A few days later I contacted them to cancel it and get a refund. After a couple months of negotiation I've been getting rejections and rejections in a refund or a partial refund. Their explanation is nothing more than hiding behind legal formalities that they designed to support their policy: all this “I agree to terms and conditions…” where they appear they got an unconditional authorization to charge my money, no matter if I use it or not. People make mistakes, people are inattentive, people click ‘agree’, and ask to re-consider the deal if they find they made a mistake, it is a normal practice around the world. But they believe it is better to punish their customer for not being interested in using their services. It is not the case when after half a year of not using the service I am asking to cancel it and refund all my money back. No, they knew I am not using it anymore, they knew it was just a couple of days after the auto-payment and I said I have no interest in further use of it. They proved to be aggressive in imposing their services no matter what.