I just wanted to let you know that you may not necessarily appreciate this response. Nevertheless, Yes, of course, what we send the first time is Never up to standard. I'm absolutely convinced that i-to-i uses the information that we, as students, send to their advantage - using our ideas for your own teaching efforts and to profiteer off of our efforts, regardless of how much we put in – capitalistic greed. I am firmly against much of what i-to-i suggests; however, they seem to enforce dictatorially on their students - "Do or else"...right. I have done five TEFL programs already, and this i-to-i program is by far the worst. I absolutely detest this program and "will" firmly say that I cannot participate in any other courses i-to-i offer and shall convey that message to anyone else I meet, potentially interested in the program. I am so frustrated with this program that I have nothing nice to say. Thanks for nothing. I have exhausted my efforts in trying to convey pleasant messages to the arrogancy of those overseeing students and the leadership in the i-to-I company to no avail; thus, I shall give it back in the manner I perceive the communication that is given in return to us as students. A terrible course to learn how to teach EFL learners. Get rid of the blatant arrogance of personnel instructing the program. Also, please, can students get actual "teachers instead of secondary tutors?" We also expect responses to projects to be in respectable English - no basic spelling or grammatical errors - as is the case with responses I have received, including my last feedback response. And, it is not just because of the British vs. American English spelling differentiation - it is entirely incorrect spelling.